Perhaps it stands in your own mind, but that is only because you have no idea what you are talking about. Let me simplify the matter for you. Being the Whitehouse Counsel trumps Ann's position working for the Senator from Michigan. And that is just one entry on Miers' resume that is more impressive than Ann's. The only thing Ann has more credentials in is authoring books and appearing on the Bill Mahar show.
-She has an outstanding curriculum vitae. In fact, she has exceeded the professional/educational accomplishments of both Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham.
Demonstrably false!
-She is "pro-life"
Again, no confirmatory evidence-aside from the public relations effort by the White House and its minions-has been provided on this front. But even if for the sake of argument I were to concede this point-which I'm not willing to do-how exactly does that prove that she has a judicial philosophy that will lead her to overturn the disastrous Constitutional desecration established by Roe v. Wade, Doe, Webster, Carhart, etc...?
-She is a committed conservative
Really? What precisely leads you to that conclusion? Her donations to liberal Democrats? Her support for racial and sex-based quotas? Or is it her enthusiasm for budget-busting, oppressive property tax hikes?