Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedom4me

Wrong!

Here's the quote, from another post now on FR: Dr. Dobson to Set the Record Straight on Miers Flap, which has the transcript of this interview:
JCD: Well, it’s true. The Democrats have so politicized that process that it’s become an ordeal and many people just don’t want to go through that. And I’m not sure I blame them. So, Karl Rove shared some of that with me. He also made it clear that the President was looking for a certain kind of candidate, namely a woman to replace Justice O’Connor. And you can imagine what that did to the short list. That cut it…I haven’t looked at who I think might have been on that short list, because Karl didn’t tell me who was not willing to be considered.

But that many have cut it by 80 percent right there.

Maybe I need reading lessons, but that reads to me like the 80% number refers to dropping the men, not dropping the decliners.
49 posted on 10/11/2005 9:23:14 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThePythonicCow
I haven’t looked at who I think might have been on that short list, because Karl didn’t tell me who was not willing to be considered.

You might need reading lessons. I take this sentence to mean that there were some women who did not want to be considered.

58 posted on 10/11/2005 9:26:01 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: ThePythonicCow

Perhaps you're right. I simply posted what I heard reported because I thought it shed light on the debate. Thanks.


61 posted on 10/11/2005 9:26:34 PM PDT by freedom4me (...Error alone needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.--Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: ThePythonicCow
- bump -

That's my first take too. The list shrunk 80% when it was reduced from mixed-sex to female-only.

But the syntax of the statements is awkward, becuse he talks about drop outs in the middle.

100 posted on 10/11/2005 9:34:37 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: ThePythonicCow
He also made it clear that the President was looking for a certain kind of candidate, namely a woman to replace Justice O’Connor.

That just shows what happens when you play identity politics.
Shame on Bush for violating his own position on Affirmative Action.
102 posted on 10/11/2005 9:34:57 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: ThePythonicCow

Yeah, I know. Don't understand why it HAD to be a woman. Fight on!


110 posted on 10/11/2005 9:35:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndreconmarine; Stellar Dendrite; nerdgirl; Ol' Sparky; Map Kernow; Betaille; Pessimist; ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1500910/posts?page=49#49


124 posted on 10/11/2005 9:39:09 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: ThePythonicCow
Not if you read the two paragraphs in front of it:

But we also talked about something else, and I think this is the first time this has been disclosed. Some of the other candidates who had been on that short list, and that many conservatives are now upset about were highly qualified individuals that had been passed over. Well, what Karl told me is that some of those individuals took themselves off that list and they would not allow their names to be considered, because the process has become so vicious and so vitriolic and so bitter, that they didn’t want to subject themselves or the members of their families to it.

So, even today, many conservatives and many of ‘em friends of mine, are being interviewed on talk shows and national television programs. And they’re saying, “Why didn’t the President appoint so-and-so? He or she would have been great. They had a wonderful judicial record. They would have been the kind of person we’ve been hoping and working and praying for to be on the Court. Well, it very well may be that those individuals didn’t want to be appointed.

159 posted on 10/11/2005 9:45:40 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: ThePythonicCow

I think you are spot on target.


202 posted on 10/11/2005 9:55:16 PM PDT by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson