Skip to comments.
80% of Potential SCOTUS Nominees on W's List Decline His Offer
Fox News
| 10-11-05
| freedom4me
Posted on 10/11/2005 9:08:44 PM PDT by freedom4me
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 761-770 next last
To: Cautor
You mean when Owens, Rogers Brown, Prior, and three other very conservative judges were confirmed in the span of five weeks few months ago.
Yep President Bush really betrayed his nominees (end of extreme sarcasm).
221
posted on
10/11/2005 9:59:06 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
To: You Dirty Rats
Anyway, 1991 was ages ago. Nobody dreamed of using the filibuster to stop Thomas. Today it's a whole new ballgame.
I dunno. I don't think the Democrats would try to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee. If they did, they'd get their asses handed to them.
222
posted on
10/11/2005 9:59:16 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
To: onyx
What difference does it make if the nominee is Catholic, Jewish, Hindu or any other religion. Do we need a litmus test about that too?
223
posted on
10/11/2005 9:59:16 PM PDT
by
gpapa
(Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
To: DTogo
The SCOTUS nomination should be a Constitutional decision, not a political move.
deserves to be repeated
224
posted on
10/11/2005 9:59:21 PM PDT
by
Stellar Dendrite
( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
To: DTogo
The SCOTUS nomination should be a Constitutional decision, not a political move.The decision is made by political people.
Of course Supreme Court justice nominations are going to be political.
Should Bush appoint Lawrence Tribe? He teaches constitutional law at Harvard, after all.
225
posted on
10/11/2005 9:59:28 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: Howlin
What do you mean by:
Do you mean Dobson did not utter the "80 percent" rather John did? I don't see that.
I see a paragraph break just before the "80 percent", but no "John" leading that paragraph to indicate a change of speaker, and the rest of the paragraph following the "80 percent" continues to discuss, in the first person, what the speaker would or would not reveal - namely I claim that Bush cut the list to just the women.
226
posted on
10/11/2005 9:59:51 PM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
To: jonrick46
Hey, it should be noted that the last time the DemoRats initiated a "high-tech" lynching they lost. We won, remember. It was a brutal, ugly, nasty, dirty, despicable process but we fought tooth and nail and won. We have a strong voice on the court because of our willingness to go to the mat with the DemoRats. Justice Thomas is a reliable, staunch conservative vote on the Supreme Court.
To: Jim Robinson
"Well, that leaves 20% who are unafraid hard as nails conservatives. Damn the RINOs, let the battle rage on!"
God bless you Jim. You didn't put this much effort into making this the #1 conservative site on the web to have a bunch of RINOs take over the farm. Damn if I will yield to them.
228
posted on
10/11/2005 10:00:22 PM PDT
by
Cautor
To: daviscupper
I say, fire away!!! It would be wonderful to see some of those pompous windbags put down by JRB.... I know Senators claim to cherish an atmosphere of collegiality, but that tradition has been so trashed by Ted-the-Swimmer, Leaky Leahy, and their pals that it might be therapeutic to have a SCOTUS who could fight back.
229
posted on
10/11/2005 10:00:49 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Bill Clinton: "I did not have sex with any of the skeletons in my closet!")
To: BamaGirl
No. The real problem has always been the RINOs in the senate. There is a whole host of things that people worked hard for that were defeated thanks to that group.
230
posted on
10/11/2005 10:00:54 PM PDT
by
AZ_Cowboy
("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
To: Kryptonite
20% rise to the top, the other 80% don't make it. I'd rather be on top than on the bottom.
231
posted on
10/11/2005 10:01:18 PM PDT
by
gpapa
(Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
To: jpsb
I disagree, Duty, Honor, Country. In a country where military service and judicial service is voluntary, a great many people are going to put their families first.
You have no right to criticize them for doing so.
232
posted on
10/11/2005 10:01:24 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: gpapa
To MSM and a lot of others, Catholic = prolife. That's the rub. I am Catholic. Roberts was questioned about it too. They never quit.
233
posted on
10/11/2005 10:01:31 PM PDT
by
onyx
((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: Jim Robinson
I like that. "Fight on"! LOL
234
posted on
10/11/2005 10:02:03 PM PDT
by
dc-zoo
To: AZ_Cowboy
No. The real problem has always been the RINOs in the senate. There is a whole host of things that people worked hard for that were defeated thanks to that group.
---
Yeah those guys suck. I think they are undercover agents working for the Democrats.
235
posted on
10/11/2005 10:02:21 PM PDT
by
BamaGirl
(The Framers Rule!)
To: FFIGHTER
The whole thing is odd. When Justice O'Connor(woman) resigns, nomination of Roberts(man), so sex wasn't the issue. Nominee Roberts move up and over with the death of Chief Justice Rehnquist and now Justice O'Connor's replacement, now replacement once removed, has to be a woman?Exactly. That's why this whole story is full of holes. It's BS.
To: Jim Robinson
Whoever's advising the president on this needs to grow a bigger pair!! Its too bad for us that the only adviser WITH a pair has been busy, which allowed Andy Card to hold sway on this one. All the rest are women, not to fault them. Rove was supposed to have been against this pick. I don't think Bush will make this mistake twice. But, if Miers doesn't drop out, he might not get a chance to do it again.
Bush was busy with the hurricanes and Iraq. The staff has to take the blame this time around.
237
posted on
10/11/2005 10:03:33 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: sinkspur
The decison will be made BY THE PEOPLE. Just like it says in the Constitution. Politicans work for US remember?
To: rbmillerjr
Dobson believed it lol. What's that say about Rove and Bush?
To: FFIGHTER
When Justice O'Connor(woman) resigns, nomination of Roberts(man), so sex wasn't the issue.
Roberts had to be put in play when O'Connor resigned so that he would be more visible and part way through the process when Rehnquist went down. There is balancing going on, but not simply one for one.
240
posted on
10/11/2005 10:04:38 PM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 761-770 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson