[Smokin' Joe]

By your analysis, no, it doesn't. You only have evidence from when readings are made. You have no evidence of *transitional* locations of the continents between readings. You cannot prove that when nobody is looking, the continents don't just quantum tunnel those few parts of a millimeter before the next reading.

So what? It's a theory!

You are really hurting for arguments when you equate a series of hypothetical biological ancestors with the movement of billions of tons of rock.

What kind of engineer are you, anyway?

This is actually fun, here I am arguing that if you cannot measure it it isn't fact, and an engineer is contending otherwise. Thanks for the laugh.

Have a nice day.

[orionblamblam]

> here I am arguing that if you cannot measure it it isn't fact, and an engineer is contending otherwise

Uh... no. The fact that *you* don't know how to quantify genetic change over time does not mean that nobody else does. Or in fac tthat nobody *has* (here's a hint: they have).

Again, arguements from incredulity are at best laughable.