Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Attacking Frum, or his motives, will not alter the essential point which is Miers was clearly not the strongest candidate available for SCOTUS. She has no history that gives one comfort she can withstand the pressures of the office.You knew Scalia and Thomas would handle the pressure because of their history of having done so throughout their lives.

We fought for 30 years to overturn the tyranny of the court and now when the opportunity is presented we are left with question marks.
213 posted on 10/11/2005 9:13:36 AM PDT by wmfights (lead, follow, or get out of the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights
You knew Scalia and Thomas would handle the pressure because of their history of having done so throughout their lives.

I didn't know about Clarence Thomas. His paper trail was thin, George HW Bush hailed him as "the best candidate available," when it was clear he was replacing the black member of the SC, and he lied in his hearings, when he said that he had never discussed Roe v. Wade with anyone.

So, Thomas was an unknown quantity to me, though I did rally to him when Anita Hill entered the picture.

215 posted on 10/11/2005 9:17:20 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson