Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
Where do you think I am going wrong? (Please be specific.)

Find a book called the BIBLE, ask the HOLY SPIRIT to help increase your faith, and study BIBLE diligently. If your are sincere, GOD WILL allow you to understand what you are now not able to understand.

If you want miracles from ME, sorry, I'm just a mortal man.

179 posted on 10/12/2005 6:37:33 PM PDT by OKWNORD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
Where do you think I am going wrong?

Now you know.

180 posted on 10/12/2005 7:00:39 PM PDT by PatrickHenry ( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

To: OKWNORD
THAT'S RIGHT THE WORLDWIDE BIBLICAL FLOOD CAUSED THE FOSSIL RECORD. THE FLOOD HAPPENED ABOUT 4000 YEARS AGO!

=============

I have asked this of others on these threads, but I have never received an answer.

I do archaeology in the western US. I have tested many sites, with good dating (not just Carbon-14 but several other methods). A number of these sites span the 3,000-5,000 year range, but have no evidence of a flood. The soil layers are intact and show a continuous record of human presence, along with faunal remains and lots of other evidence across the 3,000-5,000 year span. In otherwords, no flood!

Where do you think I am going wrong? (Please be specific.)

=============

Find a book called the BIBLE, ask the HOLY SPIRIT to help increase your faith, and study BIBLE diligently. If your are sincere, GOD WILL allow you to understand what you are now not able to understand.

If you want miracles from ME, sorry, I'm just a mortal man.

=============

I have provided a case in which the global flood, in which you apparently believe, did not, in the best judgement of scientists, occur.

Fine. No problem. But you at least admit your belief comes from religion. That's more than a lot of folks on these threads admit. And I do thank you for the reply.

I think this is the exact place where many of us disagree. I base what I know on science, subject to change with new data. You base your belief on religion. We're OK so far.

The problem for me comes with the attempt to insert religion into the schools under the guise of ID. To do so, someone has to contradict the example I cited, and thousands of other examples in this and other fields.

Anyway, at least you are honest in this post and where you are coming from. I do appreciate it.

182 posted on 10/12/2005 7:07:59 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson