To: kcvl
That's why that's the only thing they have refuted, then, right?
59 posted on
10/10/2005 6:22:50 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Howlin
They are trying to say that Clinton "only" received money from the Saudis for his LIEbrary "six years" later. Of course, they haven't opened up the books to prove it and never will because it was against the law when he was said to have received it.
69 posted on
10/10/2005 6:34:54 PM PDT by
kcvl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson