"Got one?"
How is this a 'loaded' question? You're arguing against those who oppose this nomination. You don't even state your for the nomination, instead you're saying you want to 'wait and see.' It's fair to ask, "wait and see, what?" What is it you think will develop during the confirmation process that will convince you that those who oppose the nomination are wrong? If you can't answer the question, then it appears all of your argumentation is just blind Bushophilia masquerading as intellectual debate.
I would have thought the answer to that would have been obvious: wait and see how she does in the confirmation hearings and then decide if she's a good nominee or not.
It's a hard concept, I know.
"masquerading as intellectual debate."
hahaha...