Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
In other words, it's pre-emptive surrender to the Democrats. Which is reason enough to oppose it.

What you call surrender I call politics. Bush does not have the luxury of sitting behind a PC railing against any nominee that does not perfectly fit his agenda. He must choose a nominee that reflects the reality of the situation.

I think Miers is a brilliant pick because she has no judicial track record.

You only rail against the lack of judicial track record because YOU can't judge her, and won't trust HIM to judge her.

Either trust him, or split the party...it's your choice.

126 posted on 10/10/2005 7:35:05 AM PDT by ez (W. quells 2 consecutive filibusters and gets 2 religious people on the court. Bravo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: ez

That is the fundamental split - those who are willing to take the President at his word with nothing else to support it, and those who aren't. I'm in the latter camp, because of the numerous times in the past we took him at his word and were betrayed.


127 posted on 10/10/2005 7:36:50 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson