Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pukin Dog
Correct, but they should have done so with tact, and in private.

"Tact" and "Coulter" I'm not sure are two words that ever belong in the same sentence. Though technically, I suppose they weren't. Anyway, I think those initial charges by Ingraham and Coulter right off the bat needed a public response to make sure they didn't stick. I understand your point, but frankly, some of the responses have been so frothing at the mouth that not alienating those people seems about impossible at this point.

I'll give Limbaugh credit for seeing the bigger picture and backing off. It is entirely possible to disagree and express disappointment without being destructive, and that distinction apparently has been lost on some.

1,003 posted on 10/11/2005 11:09:58 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 999 | View Replies ]


To: XJarhead
I agree that many(including myself) went a little nuts after hearing about Bush's selection and reacted before thinking.

But I don't know that Coulter, Ingraham or even 'yours truly' should be held to the same standard as the White House. They get paid to think about these things, I don't. I get paid to not make mistakes in a cockpit. On the Internet, you can expect me to sometimes be dumb as a post. Bush gets paid to not make mistakes in the White House.

1,007 posted on 10/11/2005 11:17:34 AM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1003 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson