To: Ursus arctos horribilis
After reading the article I was left with ok SO? The focus was more on the 3 fund raisers and them being crooks, making the Clintons look like the victims. Where is the proof they committed a crime and knew? Am I missing something here?
37 posted on
10/08/2005 11:56:02 AM PDT by
Thumbellina
(As I recall, Kerry referred to terrorism as "overrated".)
To: Thumbellina
The significance of this article is that the POST actually bothered to write 8,000 words when no one in the MSM is paying attention. The Rosen trial ended months ago. None of them are paying attention to the upcoming civil trial. Yet, they brought this to public attention and now give us the opportunity to use it in INDICTING HILLARY and to use it to respond. We will use it.
41 posted on
10/08/2005 11:59:56 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: Thumbellina
My point exactly. It was best to understate, than overstate, the impact this story was to have. I have lost count of the times the Clinton's were headed for the gaol, only to be left with nothing but frustration. Hard cold facts would be their undoing, unfortunately, said facts have came up short every time.
I have no idea what the WAPO reporter "SAID" was forthcoming? But, rule one always, never trust the MSM on anything, except to lie, and never reveal the facts and truth as to their chosen ones.
117 posted on
10/08/2005 7:08:39 PM PDT by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson