Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
...you'll either willfully obtuse or you're sorely ill-informed.

Sorely ill-informed? No. Sorely uninformed. As of yet those of us who rely on the public record know NOTHING of her judicial temperament. There's nothing on the public record to know.

Willfully obtuse? Meaning I'm missing what? Aside from her church affiliation and friendship with the President, I have no information on her at all.

If you have special information, please, share it. The public record is bereft, because she has no public record of relevance.

At this special moment in history, conservatives are expected to accept an enigma and a promise.

279 posted on 10/08/2005 5:09:51 AM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

Just like I asked; you're being willfully obtuse.

It's a simple question; that you won't answer it is very telling.


285 posted on 10/08/2005 5:39:24 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

We knew he wouldn't nominate another Catholic. That would make five (oh the horrors). So what does he do? He nominates a SOUTHERN Christian woman who he knows personally and professionally. JP, she's Karen Hughes sans the political voice. The doc is thrilled. I hope you'll see the brilliance in this nomination.

Unfortunately, Ellen Ratner and others are catching on... calling her his stealth nomination to send the court to the Right.



295 posted on 10/08/2005 6:04:24 AM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson