Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JerseyHighlander
By why does any nominee have to have an established record?

If an established record was the requirement for the Supreme Court, the founding fathers would have written that condition in.

They did not, leaving the Court open for nominees from all walks of life and not just judges with established records.

206 posted on 10/08/2005 12:00:10 AM PDT by carton253 (It's better to have a gun and not need it than not have a gun and need it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: carton253
By why does any nominee have to have an established record?

Because the power of the Courts have been so badly abused, some of us would like to have substantial evidence that a candidate is not going to compound that problem by engaging in judicial activism.

The Founding Fathers didn't envision penumbras and emanations and foreign precedent and so forth.

296 posted on 10/08/2005 6:07:20 AM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson