Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeRep
No, she won't be.

In fact, those vital, urgent decisions are the very ones from which she will have to recuse herself.

That is, if she has even the faintest conception of judicial ethics and propriety.

10 posted on 10/07/2005 9:12:24 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Perhaps she will recuse herself from judging the constitutionality of these war decisions. These are crucial years in the war on terror and some of those national security court cases will be new and she will be the swing vote for national defense.


20 posted on 10/07/2005 9:22:00 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Miers is the conservative activist's Mystery Date. I only wish this weren't so serious.

182 posted on 10/07/2005 11:40:39 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson