"That's fine. I, however, do not make my desicions based on who is on TV."
Well, as much as I frequently agree with your opinions, it appears this time you are making YOUR decision based on trusting Bush, which is about as bad as basing it on whose on TV. Bush Sr. appointed Souter. Reagan appointed O'Connor (against the advice of many of his conservative advisors). Anyone can make a mistake, especially when there is no constitutional law track record anywhere to be seen. Just hope you are guessing right here, as it truly is just a guess, isn't it. Even Bush Jr. is just guessing, as there is no record to look at, just his "gut" instinct.
So, should the nominee have been Luttig, for example, could you guarantee he wouldn't have gone native once ensconced on the court, like Kennedy or O'Connor? No.
I want to hear her testimony. If she is incompetent or appears to be liberal, I will withdraw my support.