Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/07/2005 12:19:07 PM PDT by eakole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: eakole

Activism/Chapters --- Many need to learn what this means.


2 posted on 10/07/2005 12:22:06 PM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole
Without such a track record, I doubt if she knows what her principles will be as a Judge, for she was never in a position of absolute power and as we know “absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Cripes, she hasn't been nominated for a week and you have her scoped for a usurping tyrant. Plenty of folks with track records went on and were major usurpers at SCOTUS, so this argument is absurd.

Finally, consider Ms Miers in the light of the following “Peter Principle” quotations:

Miers rose to be managing partner. She couldn't rise any higher in her law firm. So you have no way of knowing if she reached a Peter Principle point. Instead, she went from managing partner to attorney for a governor and then to the White House. That sure doesn't look like the Peter Principle at work to me.

There are rational arguments to be made against Miers. This wasn't one of them.

3 posted on 10/07/2005 12:29:33 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole

This worthless vanity deserved a "Barf Alert".


4 posted on 10/07/2005 12:30:08 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (They misunderestimated Roberts; now they are misunderestimating Miers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole
You wrote, "Because of these unknowns, neither she nor I have any established fact or plausible reason to argue in favor of her affirmation."

And you are? Why not a vanity warning next time? Tossing in a hackneyed quote from Lord Acton and select passages from 'The Peter Principle' to buttress a rambling, disjointed argument against the President's latest SCOTUS nomination doesn't exactly establish your bona fides as an authority on the subject. There are plenty of threads on this forum dealing with this topic. Join one.
6 posted on 10/07/2005 12:35:43 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole

Acton actually said power *tends* to corrupt. Leaving out 'tends' is like saying it makes no difference whether a `lightning bug' (firefly) or lightning lands on your head. (Twain)

Or like the dums reciting the story of the prostitute saved from stoning--usually to justify some abhorrent behavior--without including that He also admonished her to "go and sin no more".

Sincerely,
Mr. Language Person


7 posted on 10/07/2005 12:38:12 PM PDT by tumblindice (The Ghost and Ms. Miers: let's get off the poor woman's back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole

Medved summed it up rather nicely yesterday. I'll try to summarize what he said.

He pointed to the fact that Souter, Kennedy, and O'Conner all had excellent records as conservative judges before getting on the Supreme Court. They moved to the left AFTER getting on the SC.

Moving to the left is a power grab. Bush chose Miers because he knew her not to be a power-hungry individual, and he knows her as a conservative. He picked her because he cannot see her moving to the left once she is on the court.

The problem with Souter, Kennedy, and O'Conner is that the President appointed them WITHOUT knowing them personally. For this reason, their jump to the left came unexpectedly.


8 posted on 10/07/2005 12:50:38 PM PDT by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole

such is the reason why it's more important what's truly in her heart and her conviction as born-again says more to me than any diatribe her critics can assemble & will probably prove Thomas like in her opinions which are likewise written from the gut.


9 posted on 10/07/2005 12:53:36 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole

More BS from the chattering class.


10 posted on 10/07/2005 1:00:24 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Conservatives don't want judicial "litmus tests", UNLESS they supply the test that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yall
The next time I post, if you've NOT taken care of business by then....you'll be looking at The Ever Loverly Helen Thomas's picture. Thank you. :)
11 posted on 10/07/2005 1:40:03 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Keeping an eye on the Sidebeer Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1335238/posts
Posting refresher course - Please read
Admin Lecture Series ^ | February 3, 2005 | Olive
General/Chat


All non-sourced non-news threads are posted here. This doesn’t mean your one thought is a thread by itself. Lately, we have been seeing articles posted that should be comments made on the main article. Your comment/vanity article will be pulled or moved to General/Chat. Vanities should be limited to the mission of Free Republic


12 posted on 10/07/2005 1:54:56 PM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole

Bloggers & Personal


For all of you who have blogs or personal web sites or personal news or opinion or forum sites that you would like to discuss or promote on Free Republic, here's the place to do it.

Our new Bloggers & Personal forum is for:

Posting from your blog.


Posting from other peoples blogs.

Posting your from your personal web site.



Posting from other peoples personal web sites.

Promoting your blog.

Promoting other peoples blogs.


Promoting your personal web site.

Promoting your favorite web sites.

Posting from your favorite outside forums.



Posting from your favorite lefty forums or sites (DUh and the like).


Click on the "Bloggers & Personal" forum link on the Forums sidebar of the latest posts pages.


Hopefully, this will become a very popular forum for promoting and or discussing blogs and personal opinion/news/forum pages.


13 posted on 10/07/2005 1:57:03 PM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eakole
“Work is accomplished by those employees who have not yet reached their level of incompetence.”

Yet many FReepers credit Michael Brown personally with past FEMA successes. But when things went pear-shaped in Nawlins "What could he do? He wasn't told. If only people had followed His Plan"

14 posted on 10/07/2005 6:16:25 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson