Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CitizenUSA
Hey, I think it's great she's a professing Christian. No doubt she's a competent trial lawyer, too. Now tell me how this proves she'll be a strict Constitutionalist.

There are only two qualifications to be a strict Constituionalist:

1 - a commitment to rule on only what is clearly written in the Constitution, and

2 - the strength of character to not get tempted to breathe more meaning into the Constutition when your person views may compell you to do such.

Lots of people profess to be Constitutionalists. Miers has said she will be one. But will she have the character to hold to those views at all costs?

Under that test, Scalia failed #2 in Gonzales. Clarence Thomas is the only one who consistently resists temptation that I can see. So screw everything else. I don't care if Miers had half the qualifications she currently holds. I want to see if she shows the strength of character, and humility, to hold her commitment.

36 posted on 10/07/2005 12:41:39 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Under that test, Scalia failed #2 in Gonzales...

Gonzales V. Oregon which was heard 2 days ago?

41 posted on 10/07/2005 12:45:04 PM PDT by msnimje (If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson