Thanks for the information.
According to that TV news interview, if I recall it correctly, Hinrich tried to enter the stadium three times, twice at one gate and once at another, but was turned away after he refused to be searched.
I believe the name of the ticket taker and the assertion that Hinrich turned and "sprinted away" is new. At least I don't recall those details.
Note that Boren is now issuing a typically clintonoid statement: "OU President David Boren said he has been 'assured that law enforcement officials including federal officers have found no evidence of a conspiracy involving others which creates an ongoing threat to our community.' "
If you parse that, you see that he doesn't say there was no conspiracy but that LEOs have said they have found no evidence of a conspiracy. In other words, it depends what the meaning of the word is is.
Oops. I just parsed it further. Boren doesn't even say that they say that there is no evidence of a conspiracy. He says that they say that there is no evidence of a conspiracy which threatens OU in the future.
In other words, maybe there IS evidence of a conspiracy that threatened OU a few days ago, and that conspiracy possibly might represent a future threat too, but we don't know that for sure, because at the moment they are all denying everything and lying low.
That's exactly what I thought too, Cicero. If you read that statement carefully, it has an 'out clause.' The out clause is 'which creates an ongoing threat to our community.' If backed into a corner by later revelations that reveal their lying coverup, Boren and OU officials can always say, 'In our judgment at that time, there was no ongoing threat to our community.'
The ticket taker's name still has not been revealed. It was a student telling his story of what the ticket taker told him.