Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
It comes off as "chicken" and "conflict avoidance," not just on the President's part, but also on the part of the GOP-lead Senate.

I guess you could look at it that way. I could make an equally strong case that considering other irons in the fire at this moment, especially the War, a big nasty fight inside the beltway would be bad timing when a so-called "stealth nominee" will accomplish the same end that one of those lightening rod nominees would.

78 posted on 10/07/2005 12:26:47 PM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
I could make an equally strong case that considering other irons in the fire at this moment, especially the War, a big nasty fight inside the beltway would be bad timing when a so-called "stealth nominee" will accomplish the same end that one of those lightening rod nominees would.

I'm sure the President and other have fully rationalized and justified this pick in their own minds.

But it cannot be disputed that "stealth" comes with a cost. It is not a free pass, and it does not energize all of the conservatives.

This nomination has cause me to have doubts about President Bush that I never expected to have. I dislike it for that reason too. I really really want to trust him. He is making that hard.

80 posted on 10/07/2005 12:31:18 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson