Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Les_Miserables

"Schaftley's comments are more reasoned than most of the screamers and a little disturbing when she says no woman close to Bush is anti-RvW so we cannot assume Miers is..... anybody know (have any specifics) about that?."

I'm guessing that she means by that, both Barbara and Laura Bush are not anti-RvW.

".I think it may be a valid observation but I don't know"

I dont know either.

"...(makes me wonder about Roberts also BTW)"

Uh, you shouldnt. *Roberts* wife has a prominent position in a pro-life organization. :-)


64 posted on 10/07/2005 11:07:11 AM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
*Roberts* wife has a prominent position in a pro-life organization. :-)

I know but Bush nominated him not his wife...It's too late anyway and we will know soon enough.

It's an interesting conundrum: Bush says "I am a pro-life president", "Miers shares my philosophy", "she will not change once confirmed"....but pro-life may not mean anti-RvW although I personally find that hard to reconcile.

The key may well be not a pro-life approach but the legitimacy of any constutional basis for RvW in the first place. I would prefer to see it overturned on that basis and killed forever.

97 posted on 10/07/2005 1:29:15 PM PDT by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson