[alnick]

Maybe they are making a principled statement that they don't believe she is a qualified candidate to serve in one of the most powerful offices in the government. That is how I would be voting. I don't care if she is against abortion. Compared to many of the other possible choices she is a legal light weight. She is nowhere near the top of her profession.

Acting on a baseless conclusion does not a principaled stand make.

[jackbenimble]

Acting on a baseless conclusion does not a principled stand make.

It is not baseless. She lacks credentials. She along with about 10,000 other lawyers made it to partner in a law firm. That hardly puts her at the top of her profession.

About the only other credential we are hearing about is a very low level elected position and as donut server in her evangelical (maybe?) church.

She may or may not turn out to be a good Supreme Court Justice but it not would not be unprincipled to vote against her on the basis of her lack of credentials.