Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolik
That the United States needs at least 4-5 more combat-ready divisions is not the same question as the wisdom of putting more American personnel into Iraq.
. . . and to the extent that the US does need 5 more combat-ready divisions, whose fault is it exactly that we don't have them?
Hint: What was the "peace dividend," and who boasted of reductions in government spending while using it?
Even more to the point, what Democrat will stand up and say that a son in the Army is an ornament to his parents, and deserving of special honor for having gone into harm's way under the orders of the president?

7 posted on 10/07/2005 5:35:46 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Bill Clinton sliced the military from 18 divisions to 10 divisions.


15 posted on 10/07/2005 6:37:35 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson