Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

‘Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory.’

Trying to Google this. The first 50 hits are creationist sites. And Gould wasn't a Marxist. There was some other Gould who was, but not the Harvard biologist. (He was a leftie, but not a marxist.) Still searching for this "quote" ...

577 posted on 10/10/2005 4:17:22 PM PDT by PatrickHenry ( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]


To: All
I found one non-creationist reference to the mined quote:
Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory.
The non-creationist reference is here: Creation/Evolution Quotes. It's this:
Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths. But the data were worthless." (Gould S.J., "Ontogeny and Phylogeny," Belknap Press: Cambridge MA, 1977, p.127)

580 posted on 10/10/2005 4:26:55 PM PDT by PatrickHenry ( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson