God's account of creation and satan's theory of evolution are 180 degrees opposite of one another.
God tell us that He created everything in six literal 24 hour days. Satan's theory of evolution tells us that everything started as nothing, nothing at all and that, that nothing at all became something. Which after millions and millions of years became a tadpole and then a fish and then a lizard and then a monkey and then after millions and billions of years, a man.
God tells us that there was no death till Adam and Eve sinned some 6,417 years ago. The satan lackeys who embrace evolution, tell us that they have established their theory based upon a fossil record that, they claim proves, through the fossils of dead things, that they earth is billions and billions of years old. Therefore claiming that things have been dying for billions and billions of years.
God tells us that He created us and that we are responsible to Him and that He has laid down rules and we are to obey those rules or be punished. Evolution tells us that there is no God, that we are responsible to ourselves, that laws come from man, and that when you die you are plant food, worm food or nothing at all.
So, you see, the Word of God, the Holy Bible, and the word of satan, the theory of evolution, are complete opposites. You can not abide by one without accusing the other of being a lie.
Further proof:
God says: Thou shalt not kill. ... do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood. Yet, those who embrace evolution embrace abortion and euthanasia.
God says: Thou shalt not commit adultery. And ...whosoever looks on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already.. The embracers of evolution tell us that adultery is not against the law, it is just a moral issue.
God says: But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. Evolution has brought you socialism, communism, welfare, and no fault divorce.
As you take seriously the study of God's word and see how wrong and opposite satan's theory of evolution is, you come to one conclusion and one only. Even though evolution is, when you look at it and seriously study it, nothing but a lie, a fools mind game. They who believe in it do so for one reason. If they did not believe in evolution they would have to accept the fact that God created the world. And that is the problem. For them to admit that there is a God means that they likewise have to admit that they will one day be held accountable for their actions, and that includes their sexual sin. Homosexuality, pornography, racism, murders, lesbianism, adultery, sexual abuse, etc.
And speaking of racism. A careful look at what Darwin, the high priest of the evolutionist, said about races explains nazism, racism, the muslim attitude towards women, communism, slavery, etc. Think about it, if man evolved from monkeys, are not those who look, via color, more like monkeys and therefore on a lower evolutionary plane? Does that not explain how the Japanese justified their desire to rule the world? The Japanese have less body hair than all other humans, so does that not cause one to conclude that they have evolved further and are therefore superior? Yet, God goes out of His way to list generation after generation in Genesis 1-11 to prove to us conclusively that we are all descendants of Noah and one of his three sons. And that before Noah we all trace our lineage back to Adam thru his son Seth.
So satan's flunkies, the evolutionist have brought us racism which brought about the justification for Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin, slavery, the abortionist, and those who kill old and sick people. But God tells us that we are all related and equal.
Would you say that geologists are satan's flunkies as well? They clearly disagree with the biblical account of geologic processes.
Perhaps you should read Darwins works on this matter. He made it absolutely clear that he considered all human beings to be of the same species, and that the advantages that Europeans enjoyed over "savages" were cultural, not genetic. Let us hear him talk for himself:
" On the 19th of August we finally left the shores of Brazil. I thank God, I shall never again visit a slave country. To this day, if I hear a distant scream, it recalls with painful vividness my feelings, when passing a house near Pernambuco, I heard the most pitiable moans, and could not but suspect that some poor slave was being tortured, yet knew that I was as powerless as a child even to remonstrate. I suspected that these moans were from a tortured slave, for I was told that this was the case in another instance. Near Rio de Janeiro I lived opposite to an old lady, who kept screws to crush the fingers of her female slaves. I have staid in a house where a young household mulatto, daily and hourly, was reviled, beaten, and persecuted enough to break the spirit of the lowest animal. I have seen a little boy, six or seven years old, struck thrice with a horsewhip (before I could interfere) on his naked head, for having handed me a glass of water not quite clean; I saw his father tremble at a mere glance from his master’s eye. These latter cruelties were witnessed by me in a Spanish colony, in which it has always been said, that slaves are better treated than by the Portuguese, English, or other European nations. I have seen at Rio de Janeiro a powerful negro afraid to ward off a blow directed, as he thought, at his face. I was present when a kind-hearted man was on the point of separating for ever the men, women and little children of a large number of families who had long lived together. I will not even allude to the many heart-sickening atrocities which I authentically heard of; - nor would I have mentioned the above revolting details, had I not met with several people, so blinded by the constitutional gaiety of the negro, as to speak of slavery as a tolerable evil. Such people have generally visited the houses of the upper classes, where the domestic slaves are usually well treated; and they have not, like myself, lived amongst the lower classes. Such enquirers will ask slaves about their condition; they forget that the slave must indeed be dull, who does not calculate on the chance of his answer reaching his master’s ears.
It is argued that self-interest will prevent excessive cruelty; as if self-interest protected our domestic animals, which are far less likely than degraded slaves, to stir up the rage of their savage masters. It is an argument long since protested against with noble feelings, and strikingly exemplified, by the ever illustrious Humboldt. It is often attempted to palliate slavery by comparing the state of slaves with our poorer countrymen: if the misery of our poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin; but how this bears on slavery, I cannot see; as well might the use of the thumbscrew be defended in one land, by showing that men in another land suffer from some dreadful disease. Those who look tenderly at the slave-owner and with cold heart at the slave, never seem to put themselves into the position of the latter; - what a cheerless prospect, with not even a hope of change! Picture to yourself the chance, ever hanging over you, of your wife and your little children - those objects which nature urges even the slave to call his own - being torn from you and sold like beast to the first bidder! And these deeds are done and palliated by men, who profess to love their neighbors as themselves, who believe in God, and pray that his Will be done on earth! It makes one’s blood boil, yet heart tremble, to think that we Englishmen and our American descendants, with their boastful cry of liberty, have been and are so guilty: but it is consolation to reflect, that we at least have made a greater sacrifice, than ever made by any nation, to expiate our sin. "
Darwin had frenzied arguments on the subject with Captain Fitzroy of the Beagle. Fitzroy was a Christian Fundamentalist who justified slavery on Biblical Authority and believed that Biblical Authority trumped all considerations of reason, morality, or logic. Now who does that remind you of?