Keep trying. I wanted the conservative jurist that would have changed legal thinking for centuries to come, not an enigmatic mediocrity.
How is this thought contrary to my statement about wanting "The best nominee ever?
"Centuries" and "mediocrity" might be laying it on a bit thick. I'll settle for decades. As for "mediocrity": Miers may be very capable as a personal attorney (and let us not forget, Head of the Texas Lottery Commission) and staffer. As a Supreme Court judge?
Otherwise, I agree with your statement.