"People just want a candidate with a well documented strict constructionist history"
I haven't made up my mind, but I wonder, would this even be a question if she went to lawschool at Harvard, for instance?
From my own perspective, I do not understand what school she went to has anything to do with anything.
She could turn out to be a Scalia or Thomas, or she could turn out to be a Souter, that's the problem. It is maddening that Bush skipped over a giant pool of candidates with a proven strict constructionalist history.