Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: South40
Nevertheless, he'd have more credibility if he had spoken out sooner instead of now when he's trying to sell a book.

Do you think he was under any restraints not to publish until a certain amount of time had passed? I remember reading about someone who couldn't publish until a year had passed...something like that. I can't even remember where I read it...the memory being the first to go and what-not!
376 posted on 10/06/2005 7:58:41 PM PDT by hummingbird (21st Century Newsreporting - "Don't get me started!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: hummingbird

Certainly he may have a lot more freedom now about what he can tell the public. It would have been best in so many ways if he'd added his voice, even behind the scenes, to the pressures for the impeachment and conviction of Clinton back in '98.... and if he'd gone public during the impeachment period then it might have been a lot harder for the Senate to weasel out of the matter.....

I sure do hope Freeh now has a lot of useful things to say about Clinton's mendacious ineptitude and worse when it comes to dealing with terrorism!! Just the item about Clinton not pressing Prince Abdummah for FBI access to the prisoners in the Khobar Towers investigation (and then hitting Abdummah up for a donation to the Clinton Harem, er Library) is HUGE.... I hope Freeh has a lot more to say, and that he orchestrates his media appearances carefully to set traps and snares for all the Clintonistas who will be flooding the MSM with counter-interviews.


379 posted on 10/06/2005 8:04:27 PM PDT by Enchante (Mary Mapes, Dan Rather: so proud to be genuine FRAUDcasters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson