Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCLaw441

Rehnquist came onto the court over 30 years, prior to RvW and a number of other decisions that have seriously eroded the fabric of our country. Justices are appealing to foreign law. Judicial tyranny has run wild. We cannot afford someone simply because she is a friend of the President anymore. In addition, conservatives had fought long and hard for a chance to change this court. I am unwilling to trust such a big decision to any one man. F


273 posted on 10/05/2005 4:55:54 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: Don'tMessWithTexas
Why do you keep saying that the only reason she was nominated was because she was a friend of the President? That isn't true.

What IS true is that because she is a friend of the President and he has worked with her for a long time, he is dead certain about how she feels about the Constitution and the role of the judiciary. He knows she is an originalist, he knows that she has the temperment suitable for a jusge, and he knows she is an ethical person.

That is why she was nominated, not because she was his friend. If he wanted to nominate a friend he could have picked Don Evans.

275 posted on 10/05/2005 5:02:35 PM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Many supposedly highly qualified nominees have proven untrustworthy-- Souter, Kennedy come to mind. President Bush knows this candidate. The decision is not entrusted to one man. The senate will hold hearings on her confirmation.


279 posted on 10/05/2005 5:10:30 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson