Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCPatriot

why should we be concerned at all about the votes of the Dems - they are in the minority.

the RINOs and the McCain gang were the reason we didn't get a "top shelf" conservative - Luttig, Owens, Rogers Brown. I blame this group for that, not Bush.

I would have settled for a "second tier" conservative - someone conservative, but not "controversial" enough to spook the RINOs - but the president doesn't want the fight, including the fillibuster.

so instead we got Miers.

and I posed this question on a thread yesterday - and very few offered their opinion, so I will try again:

if tommorrow, Stevens passes away - who would the pick to replace him be? Now that we have the formula above in place, who would we get?


148 posted on 10/05/2005 2:10:08 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

Since the potus is predisposed to only pick people whose heart he really knows for the Court, he's going to nominate his mother when Stevens dies.


231 posted on 10/05/2005 3:22:34 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
Why worry about Stevens' demise or his replacement?

I think President Bush was looking for a simple watchdog...to serve as a swing vote on behalf of Christian conservatives all over the nation.

He avoided a long drawn out filibuster by being pragmatic.

239 posted on 10/05/2005 3:29:10 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson