[safisoft]

I am willing to give W the benefit of the doubt untill evidence exists to the contrary. Should that happen I'll jump on the bash Bush bandwagon but not sooner.

You have had the evidence. Bush was told in no uncertain terms that elevating his friends would not be considered a wise move. It ticked him off that we hated the idea of Gonzales. Tough. Now he does this, and you think we should hold our fire to see more? By the time some people finally are ready to jump off the bandwagon, it will have already gone over the cliff. Its there now. Come on... jump!

[traderrob6]

"You have had the evidence. Bush was told in no uncertain terms that elevating his friends would not be considered a wise move. It ticked him off that we hated the idea of Gonzales. Tough. Now he does this, and you think we should hold our fire to see more? By the time some people finally are ready to jump off the bandwagon, it will have already gone over the cliff. Its there now. Come on... jump!"

Told....by whom? are you making this up as you go? Ticked him off eh....you are making this up aren't you.

Your using the nomination in and of itself as evidence of her not being a consistent Scalia/Thomas vote? Cmon, that's a stretch even for the Dims.