[safisoft]

To keep dragging on my complaining only weakens GWB, our chances in 2006 and 2008, honestly.

I understand, but let me ask you... what for?

- So a Republican majority can spend EVEN MORE of our money?

- So a Republican majority can expand the size and reach of the Federal government EVEN MORE?

- So a yet future "compassionate conservative" President can pick one of his friends for a life-time position on the SCOTUS (passing over EVEN MORE well-known conservatives)?

It may be better to have grid-lock. It may be better to have a liberal for a President - to remind people why our cause is CORRECT.

It is time to send a message to all politicians: CONSERVATIVE means something - and if you have to TELL me you are conservative, you AREN'T. Hear that MR. President?

[chris1]

Actually, I think the ideal situation seems to be what we had in 1994'-2000', without the cigar and blue dress. Its far better when they do nothing that simply all go along together.

[llevrok]

I hear ya. I started as a Goldwater republican in 1964. I've had enough liberal republican presidents.

I am not ready to give up the fight. But I also remember Rondaldus Mangus's 11th commandment- that was to never attack those of your own party.