Harriet is a stealth candidate, an admission of weakness and pandering. If you put lipstick on a pig it's still a pig. She's too old and a mediocrity.
Just ask yourself, is this the swing jurist we worked 25 years for? The best candidate possible to stop the erosion of constitutional law? Anyone who answers yes is just a fat liar.
Sixty is too old? Looking at past history of the court, she'll likely have 25 years on the bench. As to mediocrity, how many law firms have you headed? How many bar associations have you headed? How many times a day does the POUTS call you into his office for advice?
We both have every right to our own point of view.Why don't we just leave it at that.