[Blessed]

>He's got to be at least as qualified, and his views I'm sure are better known.<

This is a less than intelligent statement.If you don't know her views you don't know anything about her qualifications.

[Siena Dreaming]

The guy struck me as less than intelligent also. The woman was President of the Texas Bar...and he thinks the pastor is as qualified.

You find some strange types on FR these days.

[Pessimist]

"If you don't know her views you don't know anything about her qualifications"

Views and qualifications are two different things. Wouldn't you agree?

[Racehorse]

If you don't know her views you don't know anything about her qualifications.

From the squared away people who are coming to stand up for her, I'm beginning to believe Bush delivered what he promised--someone who rules on the law, not someone who legislates from the bench.

Posted part of this old profile republished by the Dallas Morning News.  Folks should take a look.  Miers is an intriguing and mysterious piece of work.

I'm beginning to like her.  Hope reality matches the fantasy.

Reflections of a lawyer-politician
Editor's note: This High Profile first appeared in The Dallas Morning News on July 28, 1991.

[thoughtomator]

I didn't realize running a lottery, or being a trial lawyer, were considered good qualifications to be a judge.

[adam_az]

"This is a less than intelligent statement.If you don't know her views you don't know anything about her qualifications."

Unless you can read minds, you don't know what her views are either.

She is NOT the best candidate. She's a candidate that you are willing to accept just because you "trust" President "CAFTA LOST NCLB CFR Drugbenefit PromisedToSignAWB" Bush.

Sucker.