To: neverdem
This article is written to upset conservatives.
The Court did not DECIDE anything other than not to hear this case.
Sad as it is, the Supreme court cannot hear all the cases presented to it.
14 posted on
10/04/2005 11:55:22 AM PDT by
msnimje
(Hurricane KATRINA - An Example of Nature's Enforcement of Eminent Domain)
To: msnimje; neverdem
The Court did not DECIDE anything other than not to hear this case. SCOTUS is just letting the trial take place. It is not precluding any appeals that might be generated after the case is heard.
18 posted on
10/04/2005 11:59:21 AM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: msnimje
The Court did not DECIDE anything other than not to hear this case. It's not the most informative article.
19 posted on
10/04/2005 12:00:21 PM PDT by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: msnimje
This article is written to upset conservatives. The Court did not DECIDE anything other than not to hear this case.
Sad as it is, the Supreme court cannot hear all the cases presented to it.
I bet it works. This is a case they should hear and put a stop to. But not to worry the President has assured us his court picks will be originalists.
57 posted on
10/04/2005 1:19:13 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(Any country that does not control its borders, is not a country. Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson