Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redgirlinabluestate
Ann is just concerned (as are many of us) with the constitution. She has not said anything untrue about Miers. In terms of Constitutional Law, Ann is an expert and this woman is a mediocrity. And, she was also temporarily insane when she was a major demonrat in the '80s.

Why take a chance with such an important pick? Why roll the dice? It seems when we pubbies do, the dice eventually come up "liberal judicial activist." The dems always get exactly what they want--why can't we?

336 posted on 10/04/2005 12:31:14 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Pharmboy
In terms of Constitutional Law, Ann is an expert and this woman is a mediocrity.

How on earth does a couple of years of corporate law, and then a couple of more as a congressional staffer, make you an "expert" in Constitutional Law? Setting the bar awfully low for expertise these days, aren't we?

348 posted on 10/04/2005 12:39:20 PM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
Ann is just concerned ... with the constitution book sales, publicity, and chat show appearances.

There, fixed it.

472 posted on 10/04/2005 1:38:17 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

The same Ann Coulter whose only donation seems to be $250.00 to Patrick Buchanan in 1996?

Talk about insane mediocrity!


552 posted on 10/04/2005 2:25:21 PM PDT by LibWrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson