Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Constitution Restoration Act

First, I believe Rush is wrong on this and she will turn out as a pleasant surprise for conservatives. Second, I also believe Bush will have the opportunity to select one more Justice before his term is over. Just a hunch...


2 posted on 10/04/2005 8:11:27 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Russ

Maybe Bush will let Rush select a justice!


3 posted on 10/04/2005 8:13:49 AM PDT by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ
Second, I also believe Bush will have the opportunity to select one more Justice before his term is over. Just a hunch...

I'm on record with two....

7 posted on 10/04/2005 8:16:31 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (The mods hate me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ
I also believe Bush will have the opportunity to select one more Justice before his term is over.

With Ginsburg having health problems and Stevens at age 85, that prediction is really going out on a limb. ;-)

8 posted on 10/04/2005 8:17:19 AM PDT by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ
First, I believe Rush is wrong on this and she will turn out as a pleasant surprise for conservatives.

I agree.

And remember, Rush is a warrior. He wanted a fight with the Dems.

Plus, if there was a Clarence Thomas / Robert Bork kind of fight, his ratings would go through the roof.

If there is not a big battle, then his ratings stay at a traditional off-election year level.

9 posted on 10/04/2005 8:19:29 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ

Rush is simply blustering. He will support her as he does everything else Big Government George proposes, either explicitly or be his silence.


17 posted on 10/04/2005 8:28:36 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ

Why do we keep getting nominees that may or may not become "pleasant suprises"? We voted President Bush in because he promised us judicial nominees in the mold of a Thomas or Scalia. There were plenty of qualified people who fit the bill and were not "stealth" nominees. Why is our President so prone to being cowed by the dems and rinos in the senate?


27 posted on 10/04/2005 8:38:10 AM PDT by yooling (I don't have anything nice to say...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ

I agree with you, Rush MAY be wrong on this one. To his credit, and a fact everyone seems to miss, Rush stated he did not know this person and knew very little about her. I wouldn't want to be in a poker game with George Bush. This may be an end run around a terrible Senate blast with the result being a true constructionist nominee gaining a seat on the Supreme Court.


30 posted on 10/04/2005 8:40:41 AM PDT by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ

" also believe Bush will have the opportunity to select one more Justice before his term is over"

That's the inside-the-beltway buzz.


40 posted on 10/04/2005 8:45:38 AM PDT by Hoodlum91
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ

I think that Rush is wrong on this, also. Considering the fact that Meirs has been heading Bush's selection committee on judges, I don't see how anyone could doubt her conservative ideology. All Meirs lacks is a national reputation.


66 posted on 10/04/2005 9:13:58 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Russ

I agree....I am trusting GW to do the right thing....


76 posted on 10/04/2005 10:10:24 AM PDT by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson