What I 'gleaned' from your remarks was that you weren't paying a bit of attention this morning. The President said she would uphold the Constitution, and SHE said she would uphold the Constitution.
This has everything to do with the Constitution.........that's the President's main priority in selecting judges, and there is a substantial record to back it up.
And if you know nothing about HER, you are not in any position to make a judgement, are you??
But you're very willing to judge before you have the facts, and unless she's a liar (not to mention the President), then she's a strict constructionist, and if you blindly oppose her, then it was only reasonable to assume that you prefer judicial activism..................right?
Where do you get all of that? I am at a loss to see why you are so hostile here.
and if you blindly oppose her
Huh? I didn't even imply that. Maybe you ought to cut down on the caffeine.