Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RepublicanCentury
Please cite your basis for the "Miers is almost certainly to the right than Justice O'Connor..." comment. "CERTAINLY" is a strong word. So is your use of DEFINITELY moving the Court to the right.

My basis for saying she is NOT, is that......anyone that contributed to the election of Bill Clinton over Bush41 is NOT to the right of Justice O'Connor (who was a solid Arizona republican). Not even close.

116 posted on 10/03/2005 11:32:41 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: stockstrader

1. Keeping O'Connor wasn't an option, given her decision to retire.

2. O'Connor's vote kept Roe v. Wade the law of the land. Miers tried to get the ABA to abandon its pro-choice bias.

3. I said that Miers is almost certainly to the right of Justice O'Connor, simply because Bush picked her. He is well aware that this may be the last pick he gets. I really doubt he would deliberately blow the chance to move the Court to the right.

4. After being humiliated by Roberts, the Democrats were going to filibuster any of the real conservative sitting judges mentioned on this board (Luttig, etc).

5. Miers is untouchable. She has no left no record for the Dems to beat her up with. Only Bush knows what she believes and where she'll take the Court. Do you really think she told him she dreamed of being a moderate/liberal, and he still picked her.

6. Watch - she's the anti-Souter. She'll wind up to the right of Scalia and Thomas, but by the time that becomes clear, she'll be on the Court for life.


144 posted on 10/03/2005 11:51:19 AM PDT by RepublicanCentury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson