Typical day on Free Republic. A good percentage of this forum will trash anyone who doesn't hold their narrow minded view of what a "conservative" should be. They are the same ones who always claim they support the President but most never have and either do not vote or vote third party.
I object strongly to that misrepresentation of what is occuring.
I do NOT trash this President, I defend him daily. If you are going to advance the argument it is only the usual discontents disappointed, I suggest you prove it to be so. Start with my own posting history. It defies your accusation and I welcome you to read it.
This is what I don't understand. I consider Pryor and Luddig, etc., to be "my kind of conservative", and I want the kind of conservative on the court that all the Bush/Miers-bashing conservatives here want. But so far, I'm encouraged and comfortable with Miers after knowing her life past 15 years, and all the very strong conservative Christians who have come out loudly supporting her. So what is it that is the difference between me and the bashing conservatives here today? Is it only my being ruled by rationality based on fact, and not emotion based on assumption? I was initally po'd at Bush, but then read who was backing her, and what she's been doing the past 15 years, and I like what I have seen and heard and read.