Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: handy
She's 60 and she is not J. Michael Luttig or Michael McConnell.

That's reason enough to have serious reservations about this pick. I'd have expected someone young enough to serve for a generation, not a 60 year old.

440 posted on 10/03/2005 5:27:18 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion

Her age might be a blessing if she turns out as bad as many fear.


446 posted on 10/03/2005 5:28:32 AM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]

To: NittanyLion

Again with the age! How old is a generation to you?

See how many 80 yo leaders we have -- and with medicine going the way it is, this will only be extended. Justices don't retire at 65.

There are 40 year old idiots and turncoats, there are 40 year olds who drop dead from heart attacks. If she were in her mid-to-late 70s, maybe we'd have cause for concern over her age. I think there is enough cause for concern for other reasons -- age isn't the foremost!



751 posted on 10/03/2005 6:04:06 AM PDT by Chanticleer (Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson