What's true? My suspicion that one of the reasons you're trying to smear this woman is because you may be what you're accusing her of?
Sorry you can't deal with that.
What I can't deal with is your disgusting implications about a good woman, not to mention slamming a lot of women on FR who aren't married; of course, you have to realize that, so one has to assume that your disdain for Miers applies to them, too, doesn't it?
You are even deflated by this pick
Now you're a mind reader? Unlike you, I'm waiting for the fact; and when I get the facts, even if I don't like them, I won't be defaming her character.
I would bet my house that if you are married in real life, your spouse is miserable.
You're a prig.
I'm accusing her of nothing. I'm not smearing her. I'm saying--which is inarguable-- that she wasn't the best pick, she's too old and her non-traditional personal life are all liabilites.
In the same vein, Condi isn't a good candidate for POTUS. In life, with very few exceptions, people want people who will decide controversial social cases --especially if they are going to come down for the sanctity of marriage and on the side of limiting/ returning abortion to the States-- to be married with kids.
That's freaking life. If you resemble Harriet Miers that might be a problem to hear this, but it's objective reality.
Imagine if Bush was a confirmed bachelor-- he'd have a helluva time saying marriage is only between a man and a wife and if he was childless-- he'd have no leg to stand on in the abortion/adoption debate.
Let's face it, if Bush were never married and childless, he wouldn't be POTUS right now... that's just reality... Deal with it.