Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
Let's not forget this is the woman for, for all intents and purposes, has been vetting all of Bush's judicial appointees.

Good point. I was just questioning the conclusion that she is "pro-life" based only on the postion she took relating to the ABA vote on the issue - which was "the entire membership of the ABA should vote on this." That is, she expressed preference for neither side, but advocated that whatever position was taken would be stronger if all the members had direct voice.

1,400 posted on 10/03/2005 7:38:53 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1277 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Remember the day Bush picked Cheney? This place was worse than it is today. :-)


1,428 posted on 10/03/2005 7:43:40 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1400 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

"Let's not forget this is the woman for, for all intents and purposes, has been vetting all of Bush's judicial appointees.
Good point. I was just questioning the conclusion that she is "pro-life" based only on the postion she took relating to the ABA vote on the issue - which was "the entire membership of the ABA should vote on this." That is, she expressed preference for neither side, but advocated that whatever position was taken would be stronger if all the members had direct voice."


Sorry, folks, but vetting of nominees isn't done by the White House Counsel. There is a large team of folks who do this, and it is not that office.


1,438 posted on 10/03/2005 7:45:55 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1400 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson