Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: YaYa123

OOPS!


subtittle: "Bush and Cheney Aides' Testimony Contradicts Earlier White House Statement"

I should have lead with the subtitle, don't know how I accidently inserted it into the column.

But my own "oops" aside, the two reporters seem a little piqued they don't have more to add to their indictment of Rove and Livvy. I mean, it's old news, and totally irrelevant to remind readers that White House spokesman McClellan didn't initially level with reporters. What they gonna do, tar and feather him or just continue the whine?

I'll re-read the column, but for starters I can't see this re-re-rehash adds anything to the mix.


7 posted on 10/02/2005 12:23:16 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ God Bless President Bush As the MSM and Democrats Seek To Destroy Him.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: YaYa123
I think Pincus has a conflict of interest and shouldn't be allowed to report on this case.

The part about the criminal conspiracy is interesting. Why would Fitzgerald bring those charges unless he is real eager to please the left and the MSM.

My understanding is that Wilson was saying Cheney sent him on this mission. The Bush officials were answering questions on why they sent an incompetent critic on this mission.
8 posted on 10/02/2005 12:28:36 AM PDT by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson