Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
While I don't think Fitzgerald is anything like Ronnie Earle, he is a Democrat and it's possible that he has his pressure points.

I have been afraid of a malicious, politically motivated prosecution for a long time. It's pretty clear the original matter is a non-starter legally, because the law related to the release of her name quite simply doesn't apply to her case. So, in my opinion, an honest prosecutor would have dropped this case a long time ago.

Even if, somewhere down the road, Rove, Libby, or whoever Fitzgerald targets may be acquitted, the damage to the Bush presidency of an indictment will be enormous.

148 posted on 10/02/2005 4:03:33 PM PDT by Wolfstar ("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm." GWB, 1/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfstar
Well, I still don't see what the criminal predicate for a conspiracy charge would be.

Fitzgerald has a good reputation, and the calculus for him may well be balancing, on the one hand, the danger to his reputation by bringing indictments on a conspiracy charge that may turn out to be seen by the public as indicting a ham sandwich, with, on the other hand, trying not be become persona non grata in the Dim party.

So I guess I'm still thinking he'll go with a report criticizing Rove and Libby, but stop short of indictments, as an attempt to satisfy both sides.

You know, it's possible that these leaks from his office as to bringing a possible conspiracy charge are essentially a "weather balloon" by him to see how such charges would play to the public.

149 posted on 10/02/2005 4:13:39 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson