You can look forward, then, to indictments on the basis of your theory.
I will be surprised if there are any, because nothing I've seen so far indicates a knowing violation by Rove or Libby of any obligation. But hey, I've been surprised before.
And were you this zealous of classified information leaked to the MSM by the Clinton Administration? Actually, my question is a non-sequitor, because the Clinton Administration and the MSM were not separate entities.
Some of us "self-identified conservatives" are quite concerned about the unfairness of holding Republican administrations to a hyper-standard of conduct, and giving Democrat administrations a complete pass, which seems to be standard operating procedure for the MSM.
If you can't intelligently discuss the topic, resort to ascribing positions to others that they haven't taken.
I don't know if violating one's obligations under SF 312 raises any kind of criminal implication at all, and I haven't said anywhere that I'm 'looking forward' to indictments. What I have said is that it is anything to cheerlead about, which seems to be the dominant position around here. Even if it is legal, it ain't what I want the people I pay to do the job doing. I don't care what there affiliation is.