[idkfa]

Which is a simpler explaination in the WTC case, that a plane flying at near supersonic speed hits one of the tallest buildings in the world on a cloudless day, or that the plane was hijacked and flown into it on purpose? I would argue that it is the latter.

[conservativepoet]

Horrible and shock, yes, but not intentional. I personally don't think that was the reaction from most when the first plane hit.

[CharlieOK1]

they were already calling it an accident until the second plane hit. That was going to be the explanation until it was impossible to go with that.

[brytlea]

Which is a simpler explaination in the WTC case, that a plane flying at near supersonic speed hits one of the tallest buildings in the world on a cloudless day, or that the plane was hijacked and flown into it on purpose? I would argue that it is the latter.

Pretty easy to say after the fact!

susie