There have always been scientists that REJECT darwinism from its beginning. There is hardly a scientific consensus. The reason darwinism holds so much power is because the power of the U.S. government (as well as intimidation in the scientific community) is wielded to enforce it. Lord Kelvin and Louis Pasteur are two shining examples. In 1864, 717 scientists, including 86 members of the Royal Society signed a manifesto entitled, "the Declaration of Students of the Natural and Physical Sciences." The manifesto affirmed the Bible's scientific integrity.
Look at my post #42. Explain to me how the series of coin flips I got, which was statistically improbable, retroactively didn't happen even though it did.
A coin flip is not analogous to abiogenesis since the probability of abiogenesis is exponentially more remote than a coin flip. A protein molecule is the single most complex molecule in the universe. They do not self-assemble. Even man acting as creator has not been able to get all of the elements to self-assemble when placing them all in the same soup! One guy was able to produce a tarry amino acid - and now evolutionists lie and say that life was created in a labotory. Don't you people ever get tired of lying? The Haekl photos and peppered moths are still in school text books - the ICONS of evolution haven't changed in decades. When are you guys going to find new ones? You desperately need new ones.