[SmartCitizen]

At T(1), X and Y share attributes Z and Q doesn't exist. At T(0), Q has attributes Z but X and Y don't exist. And BTW, Q was able to reproduce and there are many instances of Q at T(0) and thereabouts. Further, it had been observed that there are thousands (or more) of cases like this.

We have been over this once. There is no evidence for a Q at T(0). Besides, Q appears out of nowhere and has no relationship in the premise (x and y are similar in Z: DO YOU SEE A Q IN THERE?). Period. Denying it doesn't do any good. It's there for all to see.

[ml1954]

We have been over this once. There is no evidence for a Q at T(0).

We have been over your denial of the existence of Q (what evolution calls the common ancestor). Do you deny Q physically existed at all or that Q existed but is not a common ancestor? Please clarify.