[SmartCitizen]

Repeated denial is a common tactic of atheists/evolutionists. However, the fact remains that in the chimp DNA hypothesis, the conclusion has no relationship to the premise. Period. You can't wish illogic to be illogical. Something has to be added to the equation or the fallacy remains. Q comes out of nowhere in the conclusion - it IS NOT LOGICAL.

[ml1954]

At T(1), X and Y share attributes Z and Q doesn't exist.

At T(0), Q has attributes Z but X and Y don't exist.

And BTW, Q was able to reproduce and there are many instances of Q at T(0) and thereabouts.

Further, it had been observed that there are thousands (or more) of cases like this.

[From many - one.]

You may complain all you want that this or that feature of biology is not logical.

It doesn't have to be. It only has to be reasonable. What is the logic behind a bluejay being blue?

[jennyp]

...the fact remains that in the chimp DNA hypothesis, the conclusion has no relationship to the premise. Period. You can't wish illogic to be illogical. Something has to be added to the equation or the fallacy remains. Q comes out of nowhere in the conclusion - it IS NOT LOGICAL.

I haven't been able to completely follow your notation system, but it sure seems like you could use the same kind of logic to argue that paternity tests are illogical.