To: inquest
I don't even know what Scientology is, but if it's as way out there as everybody says, then I'm pretty confident that most school districts would reject it without the tender guidance of the courts. It's no where close to as way out there as irreducible complexity is and there's no legitimate religious documents or verse teaching the charlatan BS of irreducible complexity but, heads up. There's people with a perverted agenda trying to slip it into your children's classroom by preying on the religious sentiment of school board members who don't have a background in biological science.
92 posted on
09/30/2005 3:22:24 PM PDT by
shuckmaster
(Bring back SeaLion and ModernMan!)
To: shuckmaster
It's no where close to as way out there as irreducible complexityI don't suppose you're aware that irreducible complexity is a concept agreed upon by Darwinists as well. They just have different views from ID'ers as to whether or not it could have come about through numerous, slight, successive, naturally-occurring alterations of a functional precursor.
104 posted on
09/30/2005 3:27:05 PM PDT by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: shuckmaster
It's no where close to as way out there as irreducible complexity is What is your best anti-irreducible complexity argument?
156 posted on
09/30/2005 3:57:48 PM PDT by
DC Bound
(American greatness is the result of great individuals seeking to be anything but equal.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson